EU vs Big U.S. Tech Companies,Danielle Staub homemade Sex tape Celebrity video part 2.
SEE ALSO: Amazon's new Echo Spot is here to replace your alarm clockIn a ruling that echoes the Apple one of last year, European competition commissioner Margrethe Vestager has told Amazon that it has to pay around €250 million ($290 million) in back taxes.
That's after an in-depth, three-year-long aid investigation from the Commission concluded Luxembourg gave illegal tax benefits to Amazon of around that sum.
"As a result, almost three quarters of Amazon's profits were not taxed," Vestager said. "In other words, Amazon was allowed to pay four times less tax than other local companies subject to the same national tax rules."
"This is illegal under EU State aid rules. Member States cannot give selective tax benefits to multinational groups that are not available to others," she added.
Luxembourg issued a tax ruling in 2003 which allowed Amazon to move the majority of its profits from a taxed company, Amazon EU, to a non-taxed one, Amazon Europe Holding Technologies.
That enabled Amazon "to avoid taxation on three quarters of the profits it made from all Amazon sales in the EU," the press release said.
Amazon said in a statement: “We believe that Amazon did not receive any special treatment from Luxembourg and that we paid tax in full accordance with both Luxembourg and international tax law." The company will consider legal options, including an appeal.
The commissioner's assessment of the holding company is particularly damning. While the operating company "was the only entity actively taking decisions and carrying out activities" linked to Amazon's EU business, the holding company was "an empty shell that simply passed on the intellectual property rights to the operating company for its exclusive use."
"The holding company was not itself in any way actively involved in the management, development or use of this intellectual property," the release continued. "It did not, and could not, perform any activities, to justify the level of royalty it received."
Last year, the European Commission established that Ireland violated EU law on competition by giving Apple "undue tax benefits of up to €13 billion."
In a separate ruling, Vestager said she was referring Ireland to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) for failing to recover that sum from Apple.
She commented on the ruling:
"Ireland has to recover up to 13 billion euros in illegal State aid from Apple. However, more than one year after the Commission adopted this decision, Ireland has still not recovered the money, also not in part.
We of course understand that recovery in certain cases may be more complex than in others, and we are always ready to assist. But Member States need to make sufficient progress to restore competition. That is why we have today decided to refer Ireland to the EU Court for failing to implement our decision."
UPDATE: Oct. 4, 2017, 12:46 p.m. BST Added statement from Amazon.
Topics Amazon Apple
(Editor: {typename type="name"/})
Best speaker deal: Save $30 on the JBL Clip 5
Rite Aid is now banned from using AI facial recognition tech
The Evil Stepmother by Sabrina Orah Mark
Eating Oatmeal with Alasdair Gray by Valerie Stivers
Waymo data shows humans are terrible drivers compared to AI
Taylor Swift is Time's Person of the Year, the internet reacts
Motherhood Makes You Obscene by Marguerite Duras
Google to pay $700 million in Play Store settlement
What’s the Point? by Michael Chabon
SpaceX's Starlink will provide free satellite internet to families in Texas school district
Dictionary.com names 'hallucinate' its 2023 Word of the Year
接受PR>=1、BR>=1,流量相当,内容相关类链接。